Inventory and Monitoring Workshop
on Landscape Monitoring
January 27-28, 2004,
National Park Service, 1201
Oakridge Drive, Ft. Collins, CO 80525
Contact John Gross at (970) 267-2111 or John_Gross@nps.gov
Workshop Products
- Presentation summaries and presentations.
Workshop handouts - selected materials from packages for
participants
Complete set of
workshop handouts combined into one pdf file (2.0 MB)
AGWA and ATtILA Assessment tools - from EPA
AGWA is an Arc interface to hydrological process models that are useful for
landscape assessment. Users can run the models and evaluate the relative
consequences of different land management options.
AGWA Fact Sheet (4.4 MB)
The fact sheet is a good first intro.
AGWA Brochure (1.3 MB)
AGWA Product Announcement
(160 KB)
ATtILA is an Arc interface for conducting landscape-scale assessments.
It estimates multiple indices of landscape pattern and condition.
ATtILA incorporates a range of data sources and integrates them for
landscape analysis.
ATtILA Fact Sheet (250 KB)
Logistics
View information
on accommodations and transportation for registered participants.
Download info in MS-Word
format.
Draft agenda
Workshop participants
Participant arrival / departures (for rental cars)
Objectives
The main objectives of the workshop are to identify a useful
conceptual/theoretical framework that is
broadly applicable to terrestrial lands, and to clarify the key issues that a
monitoring program should address. Hopefully, we will develop a preliminary
list of potential indicators, data needs and availability, and
research/development needs. This information will inform current
collaborators and guide future efforts.
An important task is to
identify and agree to a conceptual or theoretical framework that can
structure further work. This framework may require some development
to provide guidance that will help us address questions such as:
- What information best
describes the state of the landscape (e.g., system extent, patch size, etc.)?
- When is pattern important, at what scale(s), and why? I.e.,
does area alone tell us all we need to
know?
- What causes or constitutes a
"pattern"? Is the patch or matrix most important?
- How can we best measure pattern?
- What are reasonable and realistic monitoring goals at landscape scales?
We will need to consider
pattern-causing agents (agriculture, housing, roads, fences, forestry,
large-scale disturbances, etc) and the effects and importance of these agents
in different systems. How can these be measured, and how can we best use
different kinds of data in a creative and meaningful way to meet monitoring
goals? Can we identify an "edge"?
To identify broad approaches, I think it will be useful to identify
ecosystems, or sets of
ecosystems, where landscape processes have similar effects. The Heinz
Center used 6 ecosystem types: coasts
& oceans, forests, farmlands, fresh waters, grasslands/shrublands, and
urban/suburban. Is there a more appropriate set of ecosystem types for our
purposes? Can we identify sets of parks or networks that share important
attributes and needs for monitoring at the landscape level?
NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program Information
Download:
Narrative Summary of I&M and Relevant NPS Activities Using of Remotely
Sensed (RS) Data MS-Word. 160 KB.
View or
Download
Summary table of Current I&M Landscape/RS Projects.
Map of I&M Networks View / download color map.
Download
Woodward 2002. Use of remote sensing for long-term ecological
monitoring in the North Coast and Cascades Network: Summary of a
Workshop. Pdf format, 576 KB.
Remote sensing acronyms and data summary
Acronyms
commonly used by the RS community.
Download
Table of RS data sources and characteristics. MS Word format,
93 KB.
Case studies
Download
Hansen and Gryskiewicz 2003. Final report on land use change
for HTLN. Very good conceptual framework for evaluating land use/cover change
and impacts on preserve areas. Tables 1 & 3 are valuable for linking
LULC to ecological processes and for identifying sources of data. Zipped
MS-Word, 830 KB.
Roundtable
on Sustainable Forests This is a key group, endorsed by USFS,
focused on developing criteria and indicators. See their "Background
Information and Links" page for links to other roundtables.
Sustainable
Rangelands Roundtable This roundtable has about 100
participants, and they have produced a very comprehensive report on indicators
for soil, water, animals, etc. in rangelands.
Roads
Ercelawn,A. 1999. End of the road. NRDC, online (199 pages in printed form). This is an
outstanding review of the impacts of roads on systems and wildlife.
Forman,
R.T.T. and L.E. Alexander. 1998. Roads and their major ecological
effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:207-231. 2.2 MB.
Hawbaker, T. J. and V. C. Radeloff. 2004.
Roads and landscape pattern in northern Wisconsin
based on a comparison of four road data sources.
Conservation Biology 18:1233-1244. 620 KM.
Heilman Jr., G. E., J. R. Strittholt, N. C. Slosser, and D. A. Dellasala. 2002.
Forest fragmentation of the conterminous United States: Assessing forest
intactness through road density and spatial characteristics. BioScience
52:411-422. (large file - 8 MB)
Lugo, A.E. and
H.Gucinski. 2000.
Function, effects, and management of forest roads. Forest Ecology and Management
133:249-262. 1.0 MB.
Riitters,
K.H. and J.D. Wickham. 2003. How far to the nearest road? Frontiers in
Ecology and Environment 1:125-129. (color, 2.5 MB)
Trombulak,
S.C. and C.A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on
terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14:18-30. 1.5 MB
Indices
Cullinan, V.I. and J.M. Thomas. 1992. A comparison of quantitative methods
for examining landscape pattern and scale. Landscape Ecology 7:211-227.
Gustafson,
E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of
the art? Ecosystems 1:143-156.
Ludwig, J. A.,
R. W. Eager, G. N. Bastin, V. H. Chewings, and A. C. Liedloff. 2002. A
leakiness index for assessing landscape function using remote sensing.
Landscape Ecology 17:157-171.
Opdam, P., J.
Verboom, and R. Pouwels. 2003. Landscape cohesion: an index for the
conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology
18:113-126. 940 KB
Turner, M.G.
1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape
Ecology 4:21-30.
Vos, C.C., J. Verboom, P.F.M. Opdam, and C.J.F.
Ter Braak. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. American
Naturalist 183:24-41. 226 KB
Disturbance
Turner, M.G., W.H. Romme, R.H. Gardner, R.V. O'Neill, and T.K. Kratz. 1993. A
revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled
landscapes . Landscape Ecology 8:213-227.
White, P. S., J. Harrod, W. H.
Romme, and J. Betancourt. 1999. Disturbance and
temporal dynamics. Pages 566-584 in: W. T.
Sexton, A. J. Malk, R. C. Szaro, and N. C. Johnson. Ecological stewardship: A
common reference for ecosystem management, vol. II.
Elsevier Science, Ltd., Oxford, UK. (Large file - 3.1 MB).
White, P. S. and A. Jentsch. 2001.
The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics.
Progress in Botany 62:399-449. (Large file - 2.5 MB).
Ecological Boundaries and Edges
Cadenasso, M. L., et al. 2003
. An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach
to ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:717-722.
Cadenasso, M. L., et al. 2003. A framework for a
theory of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:750-758.
Strayer, D. L., et al. 2003.
A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:723-729.
Fragmentation
Bissonette, J.A. and I. Storch. 2002. Fragmentation: Is the message clear?
Conservation Ecology 6:[online] URL:
http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art14.
Responses to Bissonette
and Storch:
Boagaert
2003 and
Bissonette
and Storch 2003
Harrison, S.
and E. Bruna. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation:
what do we know for sure? Ecography 22:225-232.
McGarigal,
K. and S.A. Cushman. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental
approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological
Applications 12:335-345. 120 KB.
Riitters,
K. H., J. D. Wickham, R. V. O'Neill, B.K. Jones, E.R. Smith, J.W. Coulston,
T.G. Wade, and J.H. Smith. 2002. Fragmentation of continental United States forests.
Ecosystems 5:815-822.
External link; 355 K or 1.4 MB.
Kurt
Riitters publications page to see and/or download related papers
Freshwater Resources
Gergel, S.E., M.G.
Turner, J. . Miller, J.M. Melack, and E.H. Stanley. 2002. Landscape
indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Sciences 64:118-128.
Griffith,
J.A. 2002. Geographic techniques and recent applications of remote
sensing to landscape-water quality studies. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
138:181-197.
Jones, K. B., A. C. Neale, M. S. Nash, R. D. VanRemortel,
J. D. Wickham, K. H. Riitters, and R. V. O'Neill.
2001. Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape
metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States mid-Atlantic region.
Landscape Ecology 16:301-312.
Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes:
Taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47:501-515.
Other references
Papers below provide important
background information, include interesting applications, are
particularly insightful, or they're frequently cited.
Dale,
V.H., S. Brown, R.A. Haeuber, N.T. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R.J. Naiman, W.E.
Riebsame, M.G. Turner, and T. J. Valone. 2000. Ecological principles and
guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications 10:639-670.
2.1 MB
Flather, C.
and J.R. Sauer. 1996. Using landscape ecology to test hypotheses about
large-scale abundance patterns in migratory birds. Ecology 77:28-35.
Foster,
D., F. Swanson, J. Aber, I. Burke, N. Brokaw, D. Tilman, and A. Knapp. 2003.
The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience
53:77-88.
Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying
landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems
1:143-156.
Hansen,
A.J. and D. Gryskiewicz. 2003. Interactions between Heartland National
Parks and surrounding land use change:
Development of conceptual models and indicators for monitoring. Unpublished
report. 72 pages. 830 K, zipped.
Hansen,
A.J., R. Rasker, B. Maxwell, J.J. Rotella, J.D. Johnson, A.W. Parmenter, L.
Langner, W.B. Cohen, R.L. Lawrence, and M.P.V. Kraska. 2002. Ecological
causes and consequences of demographic change in the new west. BioScience
52:151-162. External link.
Hansen, A.J. and J.J. Rotella. 2002. Biophysical factors, land use, and species
viability in and around nature reserves. Conservation Biology 16:1112-1122.
External link.
Andy
Hansen's publications page - view or download related
papers.
Kepner, W.G.,
C.J. Watts, C.M. Edmonds, J.K. Maingi, S.E. Marsh, and G. Luna. 2000. A
landscape approach for detecting and evaluating change in a semi-arid
environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64:179-195.
Landres,
P.B., P. Morgan, and F.J. Swanson. 1999. Overview of the use of natural
variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecological Applications
9:1179-1188. 90 KB.
Levin, S.
A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology
73:1943-1967. 4.6 MB.
McConnell,
W.J. and E.F. Moran. 2000. Meeting in the middle: The challenge of
meso-level integration. LUCC Report Series No. 5 University of Indiana,
Bloomington, Indiana. LUCC Report Series No. 5. 56
pages. 173 KB.
Turner, M. G.
1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review
of Ecology and Systematics 20:171-197.
Turner, M.
G., S. M. Pearson, P. Bolstad, and D. N. Wear. 2003. Effects of land
-cover on spatial pattern of forest communities in the Southern Appalachian
Mountains (USA). Landscape Ecology 18:449-464.
Urban, D. L.
2002. Tactical monitoring of landscapes. Pages 294-311 in: J. Liu and W.
W. Taylor. Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Wang, Y. and
D.K. Moskovits. 2001. Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and
changes in land cover: Applications of Landsat data for conservation in an
urban landscape (Chicago wilderness). Conservation Biology 15:835-843. 885 KB
Woodroffe,
R. and J.R. Ginsberg. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of
populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126-2128.
Comments or suggestions? Send to
John Gross, Ecologist, I&M Program
Return
to NPS Inventory & Monitoring Program Landscape and Remote Sensing page